Open Data Portal

Citation Information

Type Working Paper - Afrobarometer Working Paper no. 55
Title Free and fair or fraudulent and forged: Elections and legitimacy in Africa
Author(s)
Issue 55
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2005
Page numbers 1-24
URL http://www.afrobarometer.org/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=39
Abstract
Elections are thought to bolster legitimacy by providing fair mechanisms for selecting leaders. In Africa, where competitive elections are often unfamiliar and imperfect, losers express much less support for their political institutions than do winners. Analysis of Round 1 Afrobarometer survey data from more than 20,000 respondents in 12 countries demonstrates that losers are less inclined than winners to trust their political institutions, consent to government authority, and feel that voting matters. Contrary to initial expectations, however, losers are more eager than winners to defend their institutions against manipulation by elected officials. Furthermore, divergent evaluations of electoral fairness are responsible for only a small portion of the winner-loser gap in legitimacy. Many more losers than winners said their elections were unfair, but losers must have additional reasons for doubting the legitimacy of their political institutions.

Related studies

»
Moehler C, Devra. "Free and fair or fraudulent and forged: Elections and legitimacy in Africa." Afrobarometer Working Paper no. 55 , no. 55 (2005).
Copyright DataFirst, University of Cape Town